By now, you would think college football players would have figured out more ways to stay out of trouble, instead of cause it. But, that's not the case for five Ohio State Buckeyes, who were suspended for the first five games of next season for selling championship rings, awards, and in QB Terrelle Pryor's case, a "gold pants" trinket that OSU players receive for defeating Michigan. That's unfortunately not all-the Buckeyes star and five other teammates also received discounts on ink from a Columbus tattoo parlor, and will miss the aforementioned games as a result (a sixth teammate will miss only the season's first game, for the same infraction). QB Terrelle Pryor posted as recently as this week on his Twitter account that he paid for his tattoos, but this investigation reveals differently.
In terms of the selling of the merchandise (which included Big Ten championship rings, football cleats, and jerseys), it's difficult to say whether all of that money went directly to their families (as OSU officials have claimed), and how discounted tattoos factor into the equation certainly doesn't have to do with that. These players didn't receive free or reduced-cost tattoos because their family had fallen on rough times-they got this service as a result of their stature as big-time college athletes. I'm sure similar things happen at campuses across the country, and yet the lid got blown off of this particular scandal.
In terms of the suspension, it's beyond me as to why the NCAA chose to suspend the players starting next season instead of this bowl game. Although the official ruling says that players may play in a bowl game if they were "not aware they were commiting the violations," surely they knew that receiving tattoos in the manner that they did was against athletic regulations? The players knew full well what they were getting themselves into when they chose to accept those benefits, and while the same thing may not apply to the selling of their memorabilia, those factors should have been taken into account when doling out the punishments.
The NCAA, while doing the right thing in digging into these allegations, got the suspension wrong. Suspend the players for the bowl game for the improper benefits they received, and hand out later suspensions if necessary to deal with the other infractions. Missing games against Akron and Toledo isn't the same as missing the Sugar Bowl, and while their team needs them in contests next year against Miami (FL) and MSU, the NCAA needs even more desperately to send a stronger message than what they have. Maybe next time, they'll get it right. Then again, let's hope their isn't any next time.
--Beau
No comments:
Post a Comment